Pre-Med Q&ACategory: AMCASpost-bac
AvatarAnon. asked 12 months ago

I know many factors go into deciding postbac but what border should be considered for GPA purposes only ,excluding other factors. For example is a 3.6 the borderline meaning it is recommended to do the postbac under the GPA and not worth it when you are above? Is there a certain GPA when reached where a masters isn’t gonna provide enough help like a 3.7 and above? Thank you 

1 Answers
AvatarOwen Doane answered 12 months ago

Hi! Thanks for your question!
 
As you can imagine, the answer here really depends on your particular situation. In general, though, for students with a science GPA between a 3.0 and 3.3, it is typically recommended by our Newnan advisors to look into post-bac and special Master’s programs. Especially if your GPA didn’t start out great freshman/sophomore year, enrolling in one of these programs would benefit you a ton if you’ve shown an upward trend throughout college and that you can handle advanced science courses.
 
That being said, medical school admissions is a holistic process – achieving a 3.7+ science GPA won’t guarantee an acceptance. If a part of your application could potentially make up for a lower GPA (lots of patient experience, great MCAT score), then maybe it wouldn’t be worth it to try and raise your GPA by enrolling in a post-bac program. If you’re at a 3.60 science GPA, I don’t think a post-bac program would drastically change that to where it would make you a much more competitive applicant. As you can imagine, this really would come down to your specific circumstances, so I would highly recommend emailing the Newnan front desk to meet with a Pre-Health advisor. Or, if you’re comfortable, feel free to stop by our drop-in advising hours for some more individually tailored advice!
 
Best of luck,
Owen, PMH Co-President

Your Answer

14 + 8 =